Executive Summary
Most bat species in Québec are at risk owing, among other things, to the human-induced threats facing bat populations. Wind energy development is one of those threats. This document presents a review of the literature, with several objectives. First of all, we document the extent and impacts of bat collisions in wind farms in North America and Québec and we explain certain methodological biases that could affect mortality estimates. Then, we identify the factors that influence bat mortality in wind farms as well as the mitigation measures tested to date which have proven effective in reducing this mortality. Finally, we present a review of the application of the mitigation measures used in certain jurisdictions of North America.
Most bat species in Québec are at risk owing, among other things, to the human-induced threats facing bat populations. Wind energy development is one of those threats. This document presents a review of the literature, with several objectives. First of all, we document the extent and impacts of bat collisions in wind farms in North America and Québec and we explain certain methodological biases that could affect mortality estimates. Then, we identify the factors that influence bat mortality in wind farms as well as the mitigation measures tested to date which have proven effective in reducing this mortality. Finally, we present a review of the application of the mitigation measures used in certain jurisdictions of North America.
According to the estimates in the literature, bat collisions with
wind turbines total tens (even hundreds) of thousands of individuals a year in
North America. However, it is difficult to compare wind energy projects among
themselves, since the estimation of bat and bird mortality rates in wind farms
is complex and evolving rapidly. These numbers are estimated based on carcass
counts, corrected by an overall detection probability, which takes into account
the area sampled, detection efficiency and carcass persistence. In 2016, we
counted no less than three generations of estimators that have been applied to
resolve this mathematical problem, with mixed success. Despite some uncertainty
associated with mortality estimates, most authors agree that the main factor
influencing bat activity, and therefore collisions with wind turbines, is wind
speed. Bats are more active on nights with low wind speed (less than 6 m/s),
and mortality rates are higher at these times.
Of the various mitigation measures studied, adjusting turbine cut-in
speed is currently the only one that is clearly effective in reducing the
number of bats killed while entailing relatively low implementation costs.
Raising the cut-in threshold of wind turbines to 5 m/s reduced the number of
bat mortalities by half, and raising the threshold to 6.5 m/s eliminated most
collisions. Adjusting the cut-in speed caused financial losses equivalent to
less than 1% of the annual production of wind power. Despite the scientific
consensus on the effectiveness of this measure in reducing the number of bat
collisions with wind turbines, it is not applied consistently. For example,
Maine and Vermont have made it mandatory to increase the turbine cut-in speed
in all their wind farms. Elsewhere in the United States, the members of the
American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) voluntarily increase turbine cut-in
speed during bats’ fall migration. Other jurisdictions, such as Ontario and
Alberta, use a mortality threshold to initiate the shutdown of certain wind
turbines.
In conclusion, the development of wind power poses a threat to bats,
several species of which are at risk. For installed or operational wind
turbines, mitigation measures such as raising the cut-in speed, shutdown or
feathering during critical periods make it possible to significantly reduce bat
mortality, while entailing relatively low implementation costs.
- Lemaître et al. 2017. Bat Mortality Caused by Wind Turbines: Review of Impacts and Mitigation Measures. Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs, Québec City, 26 p. [PDF]
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario
Bitacora Naturae no se responsabiliza de las opiniones vertidas por los comentaristas del blog. Este es un lugar plural donde serán publicadas todas aquellas opiniones constructivas, que mantengan unos mínimos de respeto y se ajusten a la temática de los post. Cualquier comentario ofensivo, publicitario o fuera de lugar será eliminado directamente.